Since foot height is a part of overall body height anything that increases foot height will increase overall height.
DEFORMATION OF FOOT IN TAEKWONDO ATHLETES
“A total of 114 male high school and college elite Taekwondo athletes participated in this study. Their mean age, career, height and mass are 17.4±1.6 years, 7.3±3.2 years, 174.3±4.0 cm and 64.7±9.7 kg, respectively. Twelve anthropometric measurements of both feet were obtained from each participant. Paired samples t-tests were used to assess significant differences between left and right foot dimension. In addition, the U.S. Army foot anthropometric data set was used after normalization of the measurements by foot length to compare Taekwondo athletes’ feet with the normal population.”<-it is possible that these people were still growing though.
“Taekwondo players have a slightly longer left foot than right foot{although bone length is not the only determinant of foot length sometimes it s due to flatter arches}. Although the mean of those differences was less than 1 mm, 21 of 114 athletes (18.4%) had a difference greater than 5 mm, which could be of considerable importance for shoe last design. While the left foot has longer ball of foot length and higher medial malleolus height, the right foot has longer lateral length and greater height{this should increase overall body height if not for the assymetry between right and left}. The ball of foot height and circumference and instep circumference were greater for the right foot than left foot, which may indicate bone”
“Also the Taekwondo athletes’ feet has a higher and wider ball of foot, a longer length of the outside ball of foot, and a greater instep and ball of foot circumference than general population from U.S. Army data”<-a taller ball of foot should increase overall body height.
“right foot is used more than left foot for kicking, it shows hypertrophy in foot height and circumference. This deformation may be caused by numerous impacts on the instep during the round kicking motion which is the most frequently used attack skill in Taekwondo.”<-kicking is a form of lateral impact. And lateral impact is likely to be highly effective in stimulating bone according to fluid flow theory.
Note that the actual bones that make up the height of the foot are taller like the lateral and medial malleolus. although the lateral and medial malleolus are only part of the tibia and fibula and actual whole bones.
this study shows that lateral impact may be able to lengthen bones.
The below studies show that it’s possible the clavicle may grow past epiphyseal(growth plate fusion). However, the studies are limited in that the only go to 25. However, the slow rate of growth is indicative of a non-growth plate based method of growth as growth plate growth is typically much faster.
“As more adults undergo surgical fixation of clavicle fractures with improved outcomes, interest is renewed in managing clavicle fractures in adolescents. The medial clavicular physis does not fuse until 23 to 25 years of age{they think this but if you actually look at the study, clavicular growth does not actually stop at age 25}, but studies report minimal clavicular growth during adolescence—studies that employed cross-sectional methodologies, which cannot not capture growth in patients over time. The assumption that clavicle length at each stage is uniform, as is the final overall length, may not be accurate if the age groups studied comprise various ethnicities, socioeconomic status, or height.
We sought to quantify longitudinal clavicular growth on serial radiographs in adolescents and young adults. Our hypothesis was that substantial clavicular growth would be seen beyond the age of 12 years.
We conducted a longitudinal case series of non-syndromic patients in a single orthopedic clinic and analyzed serial radiographic images of the clavicles. For ethical reasons, only patients with non-neuromuscular scoliosis and kyphosis (in whom the existing standard of care includes serial thoracic radiographs) were considered for inclusion. Patients ages 10 to 25 years old were included in the study if three or more serial thoracic radiographs over a minimum 5 years were available that captured the entire length of at least one non-rotated clavicle. Three types of radiographs were included for analysis: digital low-dose-radiation stereoradiographic (EOS Imaging, Paris, France), non-EOS digital, and non-EOS printed. The overall longitudinal growth, yearly growth, and the yearly growth percentage were calculated for each clavicle.
Fifty-seven patients (22 male and 35 female) met the inclusion criteria. In male patients, at ages 12 to 15 years, the clavicular growth was 4.9 mm/year, or 4%/year; at ages 16 to 19 years, growth was 3.2 mm/year, or 2.4%/year; and at ages 20 to 25 years, growth was 1.7 mm/year, or 1.1%/year. In female patients, at ages 12 to 15 years, growth was 4.7 mm/year, or 4%/year; at 16 to 19 years, growth was 2.2 mm/year, or 1.7%/year; and at ages 20 to 25 years, growth was 0.2 mm/year or 0.1%/year{this incredibly slow growth rate is atypical of longitudinal bone growth based on the growth plate and I believe is indicative that the clavicle continues to grow into adulthood via non-growth plate based methods}. We could not detect the age of terminal growth in either sex because growth was ongoing in most patients in the oldest group.
We found substantial clavicular growth potential after age 18 years, when growth is thought to be nearly finished, as well as remodeling potential even up to age 25 years. Further research is needed, but our findings suggest that strategies for managing clavicle fracture in adults may not be applied universally to adolescents and young adults.”
“Our study is unique in that it demonstrates continued longitudinal clavicular growth beyond 18 years of age in both sexes. There was as much as 10% more growth after the age of 18 years in male subjects and as much as 6% in female subjects.”
I sent an email to the authors to see if we can see if there’s a possibility that the longitudinal bone growth does not occur solely based on the growth plate.
Clavicles continue to grow beyond skeletal maturity: radiographic analysis of clavicle length in adolescents and young adults
“There has been minimal research regarding the clavicle’s growth and its clinical implications in the late adolescent and early adult population. Previous studies have evaluated postnatal clavicle growth to age 18 without analysing growth through the age of secondary ossification center closure. The purpose of this study was (1) to determine clavicle length and age-related growth in males and females from age 12 to 25 years and (2) to specifically analyse clavicle growth in late adolescence. This was a retrospective analysis of chest radiographs in patients aged 12-25 years. The ruler tool was used to measure clavicle length. Mean values were tabulated for each year of age in males (n = 697) and females (n = 672). Mean right clavicle growth significantly increased from age 12 to 25 in both males and females (P < 0.0001). In males, the increase from age 16 to 25 was 17.5 mm, representing 10.6% of total clavicle length (P < 0.0001). In females, the increase from age 14 to 25 was 7.7 mm, representing 5.2% of total clavicle length (P < 0.0001). We found that from skeletal maturity to the closure of the secondary ossification center, growth was 17.5 mm (10.6% of total clavicle length) in males and 7.7 mm (5.2% of total clavicle length) in females. During their growth spurts, the adolescent male and female clavicle have growth potentials very similar to previous studies of radius growth. Understanding these clavicular growth potentials can influence operative vs. nonoperative management decisions by orthopaedic surgeons. Level of evidence: Level III.”
This description unlike the other other one does not suggest that growth can occur post closure of the secondary ossification center.
The graphs below although small suggest that it’s possible that small amounts of growth can occur between 20 and 25
This study is not as promising in turns of longitudinal bone growth post epiphyseal fusion but it does not rule it out either.
What we would need to do is look at clavical length past age 25 to see if there’s continued changes but I do not see any papers that study that. If we can prove that the clavical continues growing than we have another bone as proof of concept that longitudinal bone growth can occur past skeletal maturity.
Non-physiological direction loading increases bone adaptive responses by enhancing lacunocanalicular fluid dynamics <-I believe that torsion and lateral loading(termed LSJL or Joint Loading Modality in scientific papers) are two potential ways to induce longitudinal bone growth post puberty) These are both methods of non-physiological loading which is typically limited to the axial direction. Most of the anecdotal evidence of increased limb length post puberty involves torsional loading like baseball pitching, tennis, etc. Lateral loading of bones does not really occur at all but there are scientific papers that support that it could potential induce longitudinal bone growth(see the papers by Hiroki Yokota and Ping Zhang).
“It’s been proposed that bone adaptation is “error-driven”, namely, bone is more sensitive to non-physiological loading (e.g., loading in a non-physiological direction). However, the effect of physiological vs. non-physiological loading on bone adaptation and its underlying mechanism are not fully understood. We hypothesized that loading in a non-physiological direction would increase osteogenesis via enhancing fluid flow within the lacunocanalicular network (LCN), independent of the strain magnitude. To test this hypothesis, we first examined the effects of physiological and non-physiological direction loading on bone formation responses with axial and transversal in vivo loading models of the mouse tibia, respectively, under a strain-matched condition. Next, an in silico whole bone-LCN multiscale model was developed to compute loading-induced strains and fluid shear stresses within the LCN. Lastly, regression analyses were performed to examine the spatial correlations between bone mechanoresponses and fluid shear stress (and strain). Results showed that the transversal loading led to an increased cortical bone response compared to the axial loading even though the strains were matched. The transversal loading-induced increase in bone response was associated with enhanced lacunocanalicular fluid flow rather than strain. Additionally, strong correlations existed between bone mechanoresponses and fluid shear stress whereas no correlation was detected between bone responses and strain. These results support our hypothesis and may explain why bone adaptation is more sensitive to loading in a non-physiological direction. The findings also highlight the key role of the fluid dynamic microenvironment within LCN in regulating bone mechanoadaptation.”
“compared to the axial loading, the transversal loading enhances bone adaptive responses by increasing the fluid shear stress surrounding the osteocytes within the LCN”
“Most of the long bones of the skeleton bear physiological axial loading during habitual activities such as walking and running. According to Wolff’s law, bones are well adapted to this form of physiological loading”<-this is why lateral and torsional loading is so beneficial.
“high strain magnitude paired with low fluid velocity does not trigger a bone response”<-this could be why very heavy axial loading does not induce longitudinal bone growth.
This paper although not directly studying longitudinal bone growth supports the usage of torsion and lateral loading to try to induce as these loading modalities are superior to inducing fluid flow than axial loading as they are non-physiological.
“Invasive or noninvasive treatment is the question patients frequently ask themselves when deciding upon medical procedures. This paper investigates the question by comparing strengths of both options in reducing the skeletal deformity, achondroplasia (Ach), caused by mutation of the FGFR3 gene. The research employs two variables: age and various treatments, to identify which developmental period is most responsive to the prescribed procedures, in diminishing the physical symptoms of Ach. By combining the emerging Ach treatments and contrasting their effects, researchers can branch to new unventured domains of viable alternatives to traditional treatments.”
“the FGFR3 gene is crucial in capping bone mass and limiting activities of bone remodeling cells: osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Thus, the phenomenon performed by the presence of this gene is required in preventing gigantism{So could we theoretically block FGFR3 to induce gigantism via a mechanism like CNP}, and mutation of the gene hyperactivates its function; thereby contributing to stunting of average height.”
“This study intends to identify which treatments: oral drug administration plus knee loading or surgical tibia lengthening, fairs better to encourage bone growth, and if the age of received treatment is of any significance.”<-knee loading is another term used for LSJL developed by Hiroki Yokota and Ping Zhang.
“loading applied to the limbs (Zhang, Hamamura, Turner, & Yokota, 2009) are more powerful”<-it’s clear that they mean this method as they cite the paper.
“1 mg of meclozine will be administered and loads with a force of 0.3 N will be placed on mice limbs once a day for 3 months for cohorts receiving the noninvasive treatment.”
“meclozine has been found to disrupt FGFR3 signaling, and thus allow for chondrocytes to proliferate, stimulate the growth of metaphyseal bones, and increase mineral content within bones. Likewise, the application of loading on the limbs motivates the elongation of endochondral bones by inducing Wnt as well as transforming growth factor-beta signaling, thereby having an effect that encourages chondrocyte production”
Janvi Rautela is definitely a researcher to watch! Hopefully this study has good results.
Height seekers have often theorized that it should be possible to use bone smashing to increase height via increasing calcaneal size. There are also other theorized methods for doing this. I have not seen anecdotal cases of this working. It should be a small and slow increase in height in any case.
Treatment with Hyaluronic Acid Filler into Calcaneal Fat Pad for Height Augmentation
“The heel fat pad plays a crucial role in shock absorption during walking, yet clinical strategies to augment its thickness for height enhancement remain underexplored. This case report presents the novel use of cross-linked hyaluronic acid (HA) injections into the calcaneal fat pad as a method for height augmentation. A 37-year-old male, with a height of 162.5 cm, sought a permanent solution to increase his stature. After discussing various options, 10 cc of HA filler (e.p.t.q. eve X, JETEMA Co. Ltd, Korea) was injected into each heel pad under ultrasonographic guidance to ensure precise and safe delivery into the deep adipose tissue. The procedure resulted in an immediate 1.2 cm height increase, which persisted as a 1.7 cm gain at both the 6-month and 1-year follow-up assessments. The patient reported high satisfaction with the outcome, particularly noting improved self-confidence. This case highlights the potential of HA fillers for height augmentation, offering a non-invasive, durable alternative for individuals seeking such enhancements. However, further studies with larger sample sizes and extended follow-up are required to fully assess the long-term efficacy and safety of this technique, particularly concerning risks such as filler migration or uneven distribution”
A near 2 cm increase for cheap and with minimal side effects could be a great way for height seekers to gain some easy height gain. Maybe you could potentially inject other sites as well.
“Our approach targeted the deep layer of the heel fat pad, where anatomical studies indicate minimal vascular structures, thereby minimizing complication risks. Previous studies have reported an average heel pad thickness of 1.7 ± 0.3 cm, which safely accommodates the filler without affecting vascular integrity”
This person is flat footed. It would be interesting to see how biomechanics would be affected more with a different arch size.
We’d have to know the side effects and cost to determine if it’s worth or not. Looking up the cost it can be be about 600-1500$ which is not bad for almost an inch.
And you can also get injections for the top of the head for another half an inch.
Vertex Augmentation With Hyaluronic Acid Filler: A Novel Technique for Height Enhancement and Cephalic Contouring
“Height augmentation and cephalic contouring using hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers represent an innovative approach in minimally invasive aesthetic medicine. This study introduces a novel technique for vertex augmentation, leveraging cross linked HA fillers to achieve subtle height enhancement and cephalic contouring. A 42-year-old male patient seeking non surgical height augmentation underwent vertex injections with 15 ml of HA filler (e.p.t.q. eve X, Jetema Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea), using a multidirectional spreading technique under local anesthesia. The procedure resulted in an immediate and sustained 1.2 cm height increase with no adverse effects at a 6-month follow-up.” Half an inch! pretty good.
And it’s effective for at least 6 months.
Before and after pics:
The actual effect:
Ultrasound images:
So you could theoretically get 1.5 inches instantly if you get both.
It is well circulated throughout the height increase community that tennis can induce longitudinal bone growth of the hand. The below paper discusses this phenomenon.
“This contribution addresses the following questions: Does unilateral sports-specific strain affect the skeletal system of the athlete? Specifically, can any differences be found in longitudinal growth of the bones of the forearm and hand in professional tennis players between the stroke arm and the contralateral arm? An investigation was conducted involving 20 high-ranking professional tennis players (12 male and eight female players) between 13 and 26 years of age{we’d want older players to confirm that longitudinal bone growth can be increased as adults} as well as 12 controls of the same age range. The radiologic examinations of the bones of the forearm and hand yielded an increase in density of bone substance and bone diameter as well as length in the stroke arm as compared with the contralateral arm. Whereas the first results confirm previous findings, the stimulation of longitudinal growth has never been reported. This change in bone structure and size can be attributed to two factors: mechanical stimulation and hyperemia of the constantly strained extremity{hyperemia is enhanced blood flow}. It may thus be regarded as a biopositive adaptation process”
Note that tennis involves torsion of the arm/hands, vibration when the racket hits the ball, and alterations of the bone against gravity(inversion/eversion). All of these forces are likely stimulatory of longitudinal bone growth even past skeletal maturity.
“He found an increase of bone thickness, bigger bone ledges at the insertion of muscles and tendons, and a concentration of bone structure.”<-Is there any way we can mimic the stimulatory pulling and other forces of muscles and tendons?
“an increased vascularization results in an increase in longitudinal growth provided it takes place during the phase of general growth. Reactive hyperemia is a well-known consequence of bone fractures.”
So there was a striking difference in the length of the ulna in professional tennis players and almost no different in control individuals.
So note that the metacarpal is what increased in length which is a part of the palm. In testing, the palm tends to be what lengthened in our testing.
“Any stroke will transmit mechanical stimuli (vibrations) from the racket to the hand. Because the absorption of these vibrations by the racket is very slow, most of them have to be absorbed by the hand”<-note that vibration is outright mentioned as a possible means behind the lengthening in this paper. We are currently testing vibration in combination with other methods to induce lengthening. I do not believe vibration alone can lengthen bone.
“The second factor seems to be a temporary hyperemia of the muscular system of the dominant arm in tennis players that is induced by sports-specific strain.”
You can see below the major difference in length between a tennis players arms
Below you can see that the metacarpal increase in length in the tennis group but not the control group:
So the key takeaways for the study are that tennis can increase bone length. However, this increase was all pre skeletal maturity but there are other studies that show increase past skeletal maturity. Including anecdotal cases. This still gives credence to the fact that the forces induced by tennis can induce lengthening. I believe that these forces are torsion, vibration, and inversion/eversion of the arm against gravity.
Here’s a statement from a paper that cites the above one called The bone remodelling cycle. “The majority of bone modelling is completed by skeletal maturity but modelling can still occur even in adulthood such as in an adaptive response to mechanical loading and exercise and in renal bone disease.”<-It is possible that this bone modeling could increase length if the stimulation is strong enough. The loads for the arms are superior for those in the legs which is why we tend to see anecdotal cases of lengthening in the arms and not the legs. Arms invert and evert all the time but this is much rarer in the legs for example. You only see inversion/eversion during for example hamstring curls or kicks. We move our arms in a much more dynamic fashion than legs in general. we also experience greater torsion on the arms than the legs. Think hammer curls for example. However, vibrational forces are about equal on the arms and legs.
